digital authoritarianism

Blondie

Blondie

Well-known member

Digital Authoritarianism in the Middle East | Hurst Publishers

A probing study of how the Gulf’s authoritarian regimes hoodwink citizens across the world in digital propaganda wars.
www.hurstpublishers.com



My latest book that I have begin reading ..

It was this article I recently read that led me to this book.

www.theguardian.com

To rescue democracy, we must revive the reforms of the Progressive Era

The playbook for taming industrial capitalism already exists. It’s the essential starting point for reform today
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com


Curious about your guys thoughts on this and what and if it played a role in this election .. because I don't believe he won.
 
IrishLass said:
Election Denialism can be a Bipartisan Sport.
Click to expand...
Of course, but HE spent 4 years claiming election fraud, fake electors were charged, and he told a crowd they didn’t need to worry about voting because he had the votes.

I have never seen a democrat do this .. ever
 
Blondie said:

Digital Authoritarianism in the Middle East | Hurst Publishers

A probing study of how the Gulf’s authoritarian regimes hoodwink citizens across the world in digital propaganda wars.
www.hurstpublishers.com



My latest book that I have begin reading ..

It was this article I recently read that led me to this book.

www.theguardian.com

To rescue democracy, we must revive the reforms of the Progressive Era

The playbook for taming industrial capitalism already exists. It’s the essential starting point for reform today
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com


Curious about your guys thoughts on this and what and if it played a role in this election .. because I don't believe he won.
Click to expand...
I don't believe he won either, but it's a slippery slope now, after 2020, making that accusation. However, there is circumstantial evidence that raises questions.
How did he win the swing states - but lose most of the down ballots in those states??
How were the results in EVERY state out so early this year when we still had a large turnout?
Why did Musjk tell Joe Rogan he could change the outcome of the election with ONE line of code - and then right after the election drop some of his Sats out of the sky?
How was he even close when polling not only showed Harris ahead in most states, but his policies were polling very low - other than the lies about the economy, immigrants, and Trans people? But women's health, in particular,was a loss in every previous election and by a LARGE number.
 
Last edited:
HipKat said:
I don't believe he won either, but it's a slippery slope now, after 2020, making that accusation. However, there is circumstantial evidence that raises questions.
How did he win the swing states - but lose most of the down ballots in those states??
How were the results in EVEYR state out so early this year when we still had a large turnout?
Why did Musjk tell Joe Rogan he could change the outcome of the election with ONE line of code - and then right after the election drop some of his Sats out of the sky?
How was he even close when polling not only showed Harris ahead in most states, but his policies were polling very low - other than the lies about the economy, immigrants and Trans people? But women's health, in particular ,was a loss in every previous election and by a LARGE number.
Click to expand...

Harris Campaign's Internal Polling Never Showed Her Ahead of Trump

Beyond that, your "mainstream" sources are apparently just propaganda.
 
HipKat said:
Ok and NOTHING in my post was not true.
Click to expand...

It's okay with me if you believe mainstream polling. (Iowa!)
giphy.gif


I mean, it worked out so well.

How were the results "out so early?" The real tell was "they were out so LATE" in 2020. That's how much time they needed for "the steal."

2020 will still be adjudicated. Brunson case.
 
IrishLass said:
It's okay with me if you believe mainstream polling. (Iowa!)
giphy.gif


I mean, it worked out so well.

How were the results "out so early?" The real tell was "they were out so LATE" in 2020. That's how much time they needed for "the steal."

2020 will still be adjudicated. Brunson case.
Click to expand...
Believe has nothing to do with it. The polling is what it is, whether it was accurate or not and there is STILL no evidence that 2020 was "stolen" just like there is none that 2024 was tampered with.
 
IrishLass said:
It's okay with me if you believe mainstream polling. (Iowa!)
giphy.gif


I mean, it worked out so well.

How were the results "out so early?" The real tell was "they were out so LATE" in 2020. That's how much time they needed for "the steal."

2020 will still be adjudicated. Brunson case.
Click to expand...
You are an obedient servant for the authoritarian regime.

You are more than welcome to start sharing their plans on how they plan to replace neoliberalism anytime you want.. or you can continue to troll and posts your gifs for reactions and continue to prove WHY trolls like you are the problem.
 
HipKat said:
Believe has nothing to do with it. The polling is what it is, whether it was accurate or not and there is STILL no evidence that 2020 was "stolen" just like there is none that 2024 was tampered with.
Click to expand...

Sure there is. Your reputable mainstream sources are keeping you in the dark on that.
 
IrishLass said:
Sure there is. Your reputable mainstream sources are keeping you in the dark on that.
Click to expand...
No, YOUR Lying, biased sources are keeping you fed with a steady diet of bullshit. No one accusation your side made has stood up. Not one. But I appreciate you admitting those are reputable sources
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top