Trump vows executive action ‘on Day 1’ to end ‘transgender lunacy’


1735008971203.png
President-elect Donald Trump speaks during Turning Point USA’s AmericaFest at the Phoenix Convention Center
on Dec. 22, 2024, in Phoenix. | Credit: Rebecca Noble/Getty Images


President-elect Donald Trump during a speech on Sunday, Dec. 22, vowed to sign executive orders to end transgender surgeries for children, to prevent biological men from playing in women’s sports, and to end the promotion of gender ideology in schools and the military.

“With the stroke of my pen, on Day 1, we’re going to stop the transgender lunacy,” Trump said at Turning Point USA’s annual AmericaFest in Phoenix.

“Under the Trump administration, it will be the official policy of the United States government that there are only two genders: male and female,” he added. “Doesn’t sound too complicated, does it?”

Trump’s comments over the weekend echo the president-elect’s promises during his 2024 presidential campaign. His statements suggest immediate changes to federal policy when he is sworn in as president in less than a month on Jan. 20, 2025.

Joseph Meaney, a bioethicist at the National Catholic Bioethics Center, told CNA: “It is good to hear that President-elect Trump has pledged to make male and female the only genders recognized by the U.S. federal government.”

“This will reverse the radical agenda that the Biden administration attempted to implement in favor of the transgender ideology,” Meaney said.

The president-elect said his first-day executive orders will include an end to “child sexual mutilation” in the United States, which is in reference to the transgender surgeries being performed on children in about half of the country.

Irreversible transgender surgeries — which include genital surgeries to make them appear more similar to the genitals of the opposite sex, chest surgeries to remove a girl’s healthy breasts or implant prosthetic breasts on boys, and other aesthetic surgeries — are still legal for children in 24 states in the country.

According to a report from the medical watchdog Do No Harm, at least 5,747 children received transgender surgeries between 2019 and 2023. This number is based on publicly available data, but the researchers believe the number is likely higher.

President Joe Biden’s administration has supported doctors providing transgender surgeries to children. The current Department of Justice, along with families represented by the American Civil Liberties Union, filed a lawsuit against Tennessee’s prohibition on the procedures. The case is currently in front of the United States Supreme Court.

Theresa Farnan, a fellow for the Person and Identity Project at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, told CNA that Trump’s statements “reflect the mood of the country, where parents know intuitively that ‘gender transition’ medical interventions are harmful.”

“It is good to see that political leaders are finally courageous enough to represent the common sense of the vast majority of parents,” Farnan said.

Farnan, however, noted that Catholic bishops have consistently taught that these surgeries and other transgender procedures are inherently unethical, and not just unethical when administered on minors, “as they alter the natural order and finality of the body.”

“As Catholics, we must regard any executive orders that the Trump administration issues banning gender transitions for minors as a good start, while recognizing that our work is not done — the protection from medical exploitation and medicalized self harm should be extended to all vulnerable persons, not just minors,” Farnan said.

Trump also said: “We will keep men out of women’s sports,” in reference to biological males being permitted to play in women’s and girls’ sports in about half of the country. He also said he would get transgenderism “out of our elementary schools and middle schools and high schools.”

This would also be a reversal of the Biden administration’s policies. The Biden Department of Education revised its interpretation of Title IX regulations to apply all bans on sex discrimination to include a ban on discriminating against someone’s self-asserted “gender identity.” These discrimination rules apply to K–12 schools, colleges, and other educational institutions.

Enforcement of the Biden administration rules, however, has been halted by judges for 26 states after state attorneys general filed legal challenges, arguing that the executive branch lacks the authority to redefine “sex” discrimination to be inclusive of “gender identity” discrimination. Legal scholars warned that the new regulation would overrule state-level policies that restrict women’s and girls’ sports, locker rooms, bathrooms, and dormitories to only biological women and girls.

Biden administration officials had been working on new regulations that would have explicitly prohibited state-level laws that restrict girls’ and women’s sports to only biological girls and women. However, the administration withdrew that proposal on Friday, Dec. 20.

Trump also vowed to get transgenderism “out of the military.” Under Biden’s administration, the Department of Defense has used taxpayer-funded programs to pay for gender transitions for members of the military and their families. During Trump’s first term, he prohibited the military from allowing most people with gender dysphoria to serve in the military, citing concerns about mental health and military readiness.
 
  • 5α-reductase deficiency (5-ARD) – an autosomal recessive condition caused by a mutation of the 5-alpha reductase type 2 gene. It only affects people with Y chromosomes, namely genetic males. People with this condition are fertile, with the ability to father children, but may be raised as females due to ambiguous or feminized genitalia.[18][19]
  • 17β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase deficiency – a condition characterized by impaired androgen and estrogen synthesis in males and females, respectively. Results in pseudohermaphroditism/undervirilization in males.[20][21]
  • 46,XX/46,XY – a chimeric condition where the person shows variable karyotype in the 23rd chromosome pair, resulting from embryonic merging.[22] It can vary in presentation from phenotypically normal, to ambiguous.[23]
  • Androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS) – a condition which affects a genetic male's virilization. A person with androgen insensitivity syndrome produces androgens and testosterone but their body does not recognize it, either partially or completely. Mild androgen insensitivity syndrome generally causes no developmental issues and people with this form are raised as males.[24] Partial androgen insensitivity syndrome results in ambiguous genitalia and there is no consensus regarding whether to raise a child with this form as male or female. Complete androgen insensitivity syndrome causes a genetic male to have a vagina (often incompletely developed, nearly always blind-ending), breasts, and a clitoris; people with this form are raised as females.[25]
  • Aphallia – a rare condition where a XY male is born without a penis. As of 2017, only 100 cases have been reported in literature.[26]
More at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disorders_of_sex_development

Keep the above listed conditions in mind as we explore this a little bit. . .

Now lets have a talk, and lets dovetail it to I dunno, abortion. Look, I am a fairly good Catholic which means I generally oppose abortion. Hold on, I assure you this is relevant to this topic and hold on ICR, put the pitchfork down, read and then comment. However, in cases of rape and incest (where I would try the father for the murder of the child), where the baby is nonviable (no life, its going to be born dead, its just not going to ever live outside the womb), and where the life of the mother is at stake if the pregnance continues, I believe exceptions to the various state abortion laws have to be made, damn shame that there wasn't a court decision in 1973 such as Roe v Wade that. . . . Oh there was and that fucktard in DC got rid of what was by and large a fairly decent and well thought out decision? Damn it. . . . Where was I?

Oh yeah, lets connect this to transgender "nonsense." Look, human sexuality and sexual identity is a complex issue that I am honestly not smart enough to understand. I don't understand why I am drawn to women with nice full breasts and round shapely asses, and essentially any woman except for blondes. I dunno, I just don't like blondes and I never have. I mean I don't hate blondes, there's just not really a physical attraction there for the most part, but enough of my sexual hangups. Seriously, the point is sexuality and sexuality is extremely complex and has all sorts of genetic, environmental, situational, and developmental factors at play. Anyways, much like the abortion issue, there is all sorts of nuance. In life almost nothing is black and white. Its, to borrow from a shitty book series, 50 shades of gray, and really 10s of thousands.

So really, like I said I don't transgender issues. I am honest enough to say its not my particular cross and its really complex and I don't understand it. That said, when people bring up bathroom politics and athletics and all that, which I won't lie does at times make me feel uncomfortable, no slamming please I am really trying to have an honest and open conversation about this because I really do want to learn, I have to wonder are bathroom and sports competition missing the forest for the trees?

I mean what if you are a parent, and your child for whatever reason has the chromosomes and equipment of a young boy, but has the identity of a little girl and when tests, if tests, are conducted that child has female anatomy or vice versa? Is it really in the interest of the state to deprive that child and that child's parents of medical care to correct that condition? Again, the above listed is about 40 of what are probably many more very real medical conditions?

I ask this because I want a good conversation on this, because I want to better understand this topic. I admit that I do not know enough about it. So please don't see this as an attack or go on the attack against me, but please use this as an occassion to provide knowledge and insight. Thanks.
 
Now lets have a talk, and lets dovetail it to I dunno, abortion. Look, I am a fairly good Catholic which means I generally oppose abortion. Hold on, I assure you this is relevant to this topic and hold on ICR, put the pitchfork down, read and then comment. However, in cases of rape and incest (where I would try the father for the murder of the child), where the baby is nonviable (no life, its going to be born dead, its just not going to ever live outside the womb), and where the life of the mother is at stake if the pregnance continues, I believe exceptions to the various state abortion laws have to be made,
Exceptions aren't real. They're just a fig leaf to let people who oppose abortion pretend to be reasonable.

Think about how an exception for rape would work. You'd be adding more rape kits to pig farms that already don't investigate rape kits properly and then waiting on a trial to determine if the kid was actually conceived of rape and you'd have to do all of this in a vanishingly quick period of time.

You can conceivably have a whole cadre of pro-life lawyers who deliberately file motion to delay after motion to delay after motion to delay just to be certain nothing can happen until after the kid is born, at which point many victims would just rather be done with the whole thing and drop the charges since they really only pursued them to begin with in order to get the abortion.

You've effectively just made it harder to prosecute rape charges than it already is, in the service of making it seem like you're not a monster. You're heaping extra monstrosity on an already broken system instead. It's all bullshit.
 
Last edited:
, I have to wonder are bathroom and sports competition missing the forest for the trees?
No, they're not. They're very deliberate attacks along the lines we've seen other marginalized groups attacked.

Think back to segregation and areas where we famously broke down its walls. Jackie Robinson is an American legend because he broke down the walls between the Negro Leagues and the MLB. Some of the most iconic images of Jim Crow era segregation are of the bathroom signs for different races.

Think back to when gay people started to be more accepted. Talk of straight people being ogled in bathrooms and of gay athletes getting boners in the locker room were everywhere.

Bigotry doesn't get re-invented. It just gets recycled.
 
Super cool that the catholic religion is injecting their religion into our politics.

When do we start taxing the churches?
Not taxing entities that make money, no matter how it's made or spent, at the level that many churches do is a major point of aggravation to me.
 
Back
Top