Former FBI informant pleads guilty to lying about phony bribery scheme involving the Bidens

A former FBI informant has pleaded guilty to lying about a phony bribery scheme involving President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter, that became central to a Republican impeachment inquiry in Congress

1734431211196.png
Former FBI informant Alexander Smirnov, left, walks out of his lawyer's office in downtown Las Vegas after being released from federal custody Feb. 20, 2024.

A former FBI informant pleaded guilty on Monday to lying about a phony bribery scheme involving President Joe Biden and his son Hunter that became central to the Republican impeachment inquiry in Congress.

Alexander Smirnov entered his plea to a felony charge in connection with the bogus story, along with a tax evasion charge stemming from a separate indictment accusing him of concealing millions of dollars of income.

An attorney for Smirnov, 44, declined to comment after the hearing in Los Angeles federal court.

Prosecutors and the defense have agreed to recommend a sentence of between four and six years in prison when he's sentenced next month.


Smirnov will get credit for the time he has served since his February arrest on charges that he told his FBI handler that executives from the Ukrainian energy company Burisma had paid President Biden and Hunter Biden $5 million each around 2015.

Smirnov had been an informant for more than a decade when he made the explosive allegations about the Bidens in June 2020, after “expressing bias” about Joe Biden as a presidential candidate, prosecutors said.

But Smirnov had only routine business dealings with Burisma starting in 2017, according to court documents. An FBI field office investigated the allegations and recommended the case be closed in August 2020, according to charging documents.

No evidence has emerged that Joe Biden acted corruptly or accepted bribes as president or in his previous office as vice president.

While Smirnov’s identity wasn’t publicly known before the indictment, his claims played a major part in the Republican effort in Congress to investigate the president and his family, and helped spark a House impeachment inquiry into Biden. Before Smirnov's arrest, Republicans had demanded the FBI release the unredacted form documenting the unverified allegations, though they acknowledged they couldn’t confirm if they were true.

During a September 2023 conversation with investigators, Smirnov also claimed the Russians probably had recordings of Hunter Biden because a hotel in Ukraine’s capital where he had stayed was “wired” and under their control — information he said was passed along to him by four high-level Russian officials.

But Hunter Biden had never traveled to Ukraine, according to Smirnov's indictment.

Smirnov claimed to have contacts with Russian intelligence-affiliated officials, and told authorities after his arrest this year that “officials associated with Russian intelligence were involved in passing a story” about Hunter Biden.

The case against Smirnov was brought by special counsel David Weiss, who also prosecuted Hunter Biden on gun and tax charges. Hunter Biden was supposed to be sentenced this month after being convicted at a trial in the gun case and pleading guilty to federal charges in the tax case. But he was pardoned this month by his father, who said he believed “raw politics has infected this process and it led to a miscarriage of justice.”
 
He and Draftboy and that was confirmed by Historian. He even told me that they bargained for more than what they wanted. He knows that YD and DB have allowed conspiracy theorists to run the site, and they both use freedom of speech as the excuse for allowing it.

That literally proves IC right about that site and everything he tried to get them to acknowledge.
I don't MIND conspiracy theorists so long as it's acceptable to shut them down, especially when it's something as grotesque as suggesting school shooting victims are crisis actors.

What always got me was yardies default of since you can't prove a negative, you must acknowledge this conspiracy as possible. But he never bothered to that with the most outlandish claims. Instead he chided those who called out those claims. He sane washed the insane
 
470512089_1632769427647728_3645247467441774820_n.jpg
 
I don't MIND conspiracy theorists so long as it's acceptable to shut them down, especially when it's something as grotesque as suggesting school shooting victims are crisis actors.

What always got me was yardies default of since you can't prove a negative, you must acknowledge this conspiracy as possible. But he never bothered to that with the most outlandish claims. Instead he chided those who called out those claims. He sane washed the insane
I don' think most people don't mind conspiracies, but that's why he is as guilty for voting Trump, even though he claims to have voted for Harris. He allows the conspiracy to dismiss the argument, and that is the reason Trump was elected again. This is where I will agree with suing sites like these IF Tumps boy Carr removed the protections given to social media platforms. The site owners have as responsibility as to who and what they are allowing sites. Marjorie Taylor Green is a perfect example how conspiracies are controlling our Government and that is not good for us the people.
 
Back
Top