And that's bad....why?And why do you think that is, exactly? Because the 3 of us just joined and now she has toys again.
And that's bad....why?And why do you think that is, exactly? Because the 3 of us just joined and now she has toys again.
I've crossed 2 lines.I don't disagree with either point, but she hasn't crossed the lines that ICR has
I'm not saying that particular thing is bad, I'm just pointing out that if you don't do something about her presence then it's more likely your 3 newest forum participants will participate less.And that's bad....why?
Well that would suck but she still hasn't broken a single TOS ruleI'm not saying that particular thing is bad, I'm just pointing out that if you don't do something about her presence then it's more likely your 3 newest forum participants will participate less.
I'm sure that's true. I think the TOS of many message boards fails to account for the problems fascist posters represent.Well that would suck but she still hasn't broken a single TOS rule
idgaf. I'm not creating a bubble where everyone agrees with each other 100% of the time.I'm sure that's true. I think the TOS of many message boards fails to account for the problems fascist posters represent.
We don't agree with each other. You're creating a false dilemma.idgaf. I'm not creating a bubble where everyone agrees with each other 100% of the time.
Politics is a vapid subject and people should be able to go at each other's views, almost as if it's a sport.
This is one of the stupidest things anyone has ever said.Politics is a vapid subject and people should be able to go at each other's views, almost as if it's a sport.
In my experience she believes the things she says but aside from that, it's weird how would up you get over someone on a message board. And trust me, you do not disagree with me about almost everything. You just take the few things we disagree on and magnify them to appear to be more than they are.We don't agree with each other. You're creating a false dilemma.
I think you're a bigoted piece of shit. I disagree with you about almost everything. Patti is different. You believe things sincerely. She does not. Her beliefs are whatever they need to be to "own the libs". Her entire political ideology is purposefully incoherent. She is the proverbial pigeon that shits on the chess board. That is all she ever has been and all she ever can be.
This is the dumbest and most dangerous way to engage with politics. People LITERALLY FUCKING DIE because of this mindset.And yes, debating politics is like a sport. It's competition.
You think trans people are perfectly normal and valid? You think gay people are perfectly normal and there's nothing degenerate about the ways they have sex? You don't think black people- especially POOR black people- are lazy? You don't believe there's a border crisis? You think businesses, if they must exist, ought to be collectively owned by the workers? You think communism is better than capitalism? You think police and prisons shouldn't exist? You think comprehensive sex ed ought to be taught K-12? You think abortion should be legal all 9 months? You think the Democratic Party isn't far enough left? You think all drugs should be decriminalized? You think trans kids should have access to puberty blockers and hormones? You think trans women should use women's bathrooms?trust me, you do not disagree with me about almost everything. You just take the few things we disagree on and magnify them to appear to be more than they are.
No she doesn't. It's just hard to notice for most people because she also doesn't believe the opposite of the things she says. She doesn't believe ANYTHING. Her consistency is not a reflection of authentic principles. It's a rhetorical tactic.In my experience she believes the things she says
If you had compelling evidence that should convince me of why I shouldn't be a Bills fan, I'd consider it. The whole idea of a political forum is to debate each other's opinions and views on politics. No hold each other's hand. Where is the educational value in that?This is the dumbest and most dangerous way to engage with politics. People LITERALLY FUCKING DIE because of this mindset.
To demonstrate why, let me ask you a question: can I debate you out of being a Bills fan?
NoYou think trans people are perfectly normal and valid? \
Yes and that doesn't change my opinion that nal sex is unhealthy whether it's a Gay or Hetero coupleYou think gay people are perfectly normal and there's nothing degenerate about the ways they have sex?
I think many areYou don't think black people- especially POOR black people- are lazy?
Of COURSE I believe there's been a border crisisYou don't believe there's a border crisis?
I have no opinion on thatYou think businesses, if they must exist, ought to be collectively owned by the workers?
I think both are badYou think communism is better than capitalism?
I think they should be redefined, redesigned and rebudgetedYou think police and prisons shouldn't exist?
I took Sex ed in 5th grade and again in 11th grade. What's your point?You think comprehensive sex ed ought to be taught K-12?
Of course not, unless there's an imminent health issueYou think abortion should be legal all 9 months?
Define too far leftYou think the Democratic Party isn't far enough left?
I think some drugs should be decriminalized. Giving people free access to extremely dangerous drugs created The Tender Loin in SF, et alYou think all drugs should be decriminalized?
And this is where we will never agree. IDGAF What bathroom Trans anyone uses. Trans Kids - well, you know quite well my opinion on that.You think trans kids should have access to puberty blockers and hormones? You think trans women should use women's bathrooms?
If you had compelling evidence that should convince me of why I shouldn't be a Bills fan, I'd consider it.
So we agree on homosexuality being normal and we sort of agree on police and prisons. Somehow we don't even agree that kids need to learn the anatomically correct names of body parts and have an understanding of consent prior to 5th grade. Not sure how "I don't think it's important for the curriculum to include the things that have provably reduced childhood sexual abuse" translates to "We agree on a lot" but it's interesting that you think it does.No
Yes and that doesn't change my opinion that nal sex is unhealthy whether it's a Gay or Hetero couple
I think many are
Of COURSE I believe there's been a border crisis
I have no opinion on that
I think both are bad
I think they should be redefined, redesigned and rebudgeted
I took Sex ed in 5th grade and again in 11th grade. What's your point?
Of course not, unless there's an imminent health issue
Define too far left
I think some drugs should be decriminalized. Giving people free access to extremely dangerous drugs created The Tender Loin in SF, et al
And this is where we will never agree. IDGAF What bathroom Trans anyone uses. Trans Kids - well, you know quite well my opinion on that.
It absolutely did not.Giving people free access to extremely dangerous drugs created The Tender Loin in SF, et al
That's not what I said nor was it the question. You asked if it should be taught in schools and I posted that I learned it in school.Somehow we don't even agree that kids need to learn the anatomically correct names of body parts and have an understanding of consent prior to 5th grade. Not sure how "I don't think it's important for the curriculum to include the things that have provably reduced childhood sexual abuse" translates to "We agree on a lot" but it's interesting that you think it does.
Dude if you give people drugs, they're going to do them and then come back for more free drugs. How the fuck does that help the problem?It absolutely did not.
1) The Tenderloin has existed since the 1800sDude if you give people drugs, they're going to do them and then come back for more free drugs. How the fuck does that help the problem?
1, I know1) The Tenderloin has existed since the 1800s
2) The drug problems in the Tenderloin come AFTER it became an area where oppressed and impoverished people found community. Their drug use was fueled by their material conditions, not the other way around.
3) If addicts are getting free drugs they don't have to do crimes to be able to afford the drugs they need to take to not die, this isn't rocket science.