So, What DO the Republicans do now...

I'm not saying that particular thing is bad, I'm just pointing out that if you don't do something about her presence then it's more likely your 3 newest forum participants will participate less.
Well that would suck but she still hasn't broken a single TOS rule
 
I'm sure that's true. I think the TOS of many message boards fails to account for the problems fascist posters represent.
idgaf. I'm not creating a bubble where everyone agrees with each other 100% of the time.
Politics is a vapid subject and people should be able to go at each other's views, almost as if it's a sport.
 
idgaf. I'm not creating a bubble where everyone agrees with each other 100% of the time.
Politics is a vapid subject and people should be able to go at each other's views, almost as if it's a sport.
We don't agree with each other. You're creating a false dilemma.

I think you're a bigoted piece of shit. I disagree with you about almost everything. Patti is different. You believe things sincerely. She does not. Her beliefs are whatever they need to be to "own the libs". Her entire political ideology is purposefully incoherent. She is the proverbial pigeon that shits on the chess board. That is all she ever has been and all she ever can be.
 
We don't agree with each other. You're creating a false dilemma.

I think you're a bigoted piece of shit. I disagree with you about almost everything. Patti is different. You believe things sincerely. She does not. Her beliefs are whatever they need to be to "own the libs". Her entire political ideology is purposefully incoherent. She is the proverbial pigeon that shits on the chess board. That is all she ever has been and all she ever can be.
In my experience she believes the things she says but aside from that, it's weird how would up you get over someone on a message board. And trust me, you do not disagree with me about almost everything. You just take the few things we disagree on and magnify them to appear to be more than they are.

And yes, debating politics is like a sport. It's competition.
 
And yes, debating politics is like a sport. It's competition.
This is the dumbest and most dangerous way to engage with politics. People LITERALLY FUCKING DIE because of this mindset.

To demonstrate why, let me ask you a question: can I debate you out of being a Bills fan?
 
trust me, you do not disagree with me about almost everything. You just take the few things we disagree on and magnify them to appear to be more than they are.
You think trans people are perfectly normal and valid? You think gay people are perfectly normal and there's nothing degenerate about the ways they have sex? You don't think black people- especially POOR black people- are lazy? You don't believe there's a border crisis? You think businesses, if they must exist, ought to be collectively owned by the workers? You think communism is better than capitalism? You think police and prisons shouldn't exist? You think comprehensive sex ed ought to be taught K-12? You think abortion should be legal all 9 months? You think the Democratic Party isn't far enough left? You think all drugs should be decriminalized? You think trans kids should have access to puberty blockers and hormones? You think trans women should use women's bathrooms?
 
In my experience she believes the things she says
No she doesn't. It's just hard to notice for most people because she also doesn't believe the opposite of the things she says. She doesn't believe ANYTHING. Her consistency is not a reflection of authentic principles. It's a rhetorical tactic.
 
This is the dumbest and most dangerous way to engage with politics. People LITERALLY FUCKING DIE because of this mindset.

To demonstrate why, let me ask you a question: can I debate you out of being a Bills fan?
If you had compelling evidence that should convince me of why I shouldn't be a Bills fan, I'd consider it. The whole idea of a political forum is to debate each other's opinions and views on politics. No hold each other's hand. Where is the educational value in that?
 
You think trans people are perfectly normal and valid? \
No
You think gay people are perfectly normal and there's nothing degenerate about the ways they have sex?
Yes and that doesn't change my opinion that nal sex is unhealthy whether it's a Gay or Hetero couple
You don't think black people- especially POOR black people- are lazy?
I think many are

You don't believe there's a border crisis?
Of COURSE I believe there's been a border crisis
You think businesses, if they must exist, ought to be collectively owned by the workers?
I have no opinion on that
You think communism is better than capitalism?
I think both are bad
You think police and prisons shouldn't exist?
I think they should be redefined, redesigned and rebudgeted
You think comprehensive sex ed ought to be taught K-12?
I took Sex ed in 5th grade and again in 11th grade. What's your point?
You think abortion should be legal all 9 months?
Of course not, unless there's an imminent health issue
You think the Democratic Party isn't far enough left?
Define too far left
You think all drugs should be decriminalized?
I think some drugs should be decriminalized. Giving people free access to extremely dangerous drugs created The Tender Loin in SF, et al
You think trans kids should have access to puberty blockers and hormones? You think trans women should use women's bathrooms?
And this is where we will never agree. IDGAF What bathroom Trans anyone uses. Trans Kids - well, you know quite well my opinion on that.
 
If you had compelling evidence that should convince me of why I shouldn't be a Bills fan, I'd consider it.

No

Yes and that doesn't change my opinion that nal sex is unhealthy whether it's a Gay or Hetero couple

I think many are


Of COURSE I believe there's been a border crisis

I have no opinion on that

I think both are bad

I think they should be redefined, redesigned and rebudgeted

I took Sex ed in 5th grade and again in 11th grade. What's your point?

Of course not, unless there's an imminent health issue

Define too far left

I think some drugs should be decriminalized. Giving people free access to extremely dangerous drugs created The Tender Loin in SF, et al

And this is where we will never agree. IDGAF What bathroom Trans anyone uses. Trans Kids - well, you know quite well my opinion on that.
So we agree on homosexuality being normal and we sort of agree on police and prisons. Somehow we don't even agree that kids need to learn the anatomically correct names of body parts and have an understanding of consent prior to 5th grade. Not sure how "I don't think it's important for the curriculum to include the things that have provably reduced childhood sexual abuse" translates to "We agree on a lot" but it's interesting that you think it does.
 
Somehow we don't even agree that kids need to learn the anatomically correct names of body parts and have an understanding of consent prior to 5th grade. Not sure how "I don't think it's important for the curriculum to include the things that have provably reduced childhood sexual abuse" translates to "We agree on a lot" but it's interesting that you think it does.
That's not what I said nor was it the question. You asked if it should be taught in schools and I posted that I learned it in school.
 
Dude if you give people drugs, they're going to do them and then come back for more free drugs. How the fuck does that help the problem?
1) The Tenderloin has existed since the 1800s

2) The drug problems in the Tenderloin come AFTER it became an area where oppressed and impoverished people found community. Their drug use was fueled by their material conditions, not the other way around.

3) If addicts are getting free drugs they don't have to do crimes to be able to afford the drugs they need to take to not die, this isn't rocket science.
 
1) The Tenderloin has existed since the 1800s

2) The drug problems in the Tenderloin come AFTER it became an area where oppressed and impoverished people found community. Their drug use was fueled by their material conditions, not the other way around.

3) If addicts are getting free drugs they don't have to do crimes to be able to afford the drugs they need to take to not die, this isn't rocket science.
1, I know
2, I know
3, the idea is to get them OFFdrugs, not enable them to do more, but without committing crimes - which still happens anyway
 
Back
Top